DRUG RELATED NITROSOGENESIS, PHOTOCARCINOGENESIS AND ONCOPHARMACOGENESIS OF NODULAR MELANOMA: A CASE RELATED ANALYSIS CONCERNING THE POLYCONTAMINATION OF THE POLYMEDICATION WITH VALSARTAN/HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE AND BISOPROLOL.

Despite the fact that the pathogenesis of cutaneous melanoma is shrouded in mystery, factors that have been neglected or unnoticed until now have come to the attention in recent years, and in all likelihood, they could also be pivotal. These factors, known as nitrosamines or NDSRIs, are characterized by high carcinogenic and mutagenic potency, and some of them have demonstrated these properties to human DNA as well. Unfortunately, these ingredients also turn up as contaminants in about 300 of the most widely distributed drugs worldwide. According to the most recent literature, some of these ingredients are also identified as potent photocarcinogens, as well as human carcinogens. The intake of these carcinogens in the context of polycontamination of polymedication, has been associated for years with the occurrence of melanomas. The need for cataloguing of nitrosamines , as well as their accurate labelling on drug packaging, would help to classify them even more accurately as carcinogens affecting human DNA. We present once again a patient , who developed nodular melanoma within the context of the intake of 3 potentially nitrosamine/ NDSRIs contaminated antihypertensive drugs (valsartan/ Hydrochlorothiazide/ bisoprolol). Pathogenetic aspects concerning drug-induced nitrosogenesis, photocarcinogenesis and oncopharmacogenesis of skin cancer are discussed. Nitrosogenesis' of Cancer as concept in the medical literature has been known for decades, but in relation to other forms of human cancer. Exogenously mediated drug-mediated nitrosogenesis is a logically conditioned and newly defined concept whose significance with respect to the clinical manifestation of skin cancer is only beginning to grow.

Safety profile of pembrolizumab monotherapy based on an aggregate safety evaluation of 8937 patients.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab has a manageable safety profile as described in its label, which was primarily based on 2799 patients who participated in clinical trials for melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer. Here, we evaluated the safety of pembrolizumab in a broader population of patients from 31 advanced cancer clinical trials across 19 cancer types. METHODS: Safety was analyzed in patients who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks [Q3W], 10 mg/kg Q2W or Q3W, or 2 mg/kg Q3W). Adverse events (AEs) and immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions were evaluated. RESULTS: Safety data from 8937 patients in 31 trials of pembrolizumab monotherapy were pooled (median, seven administrations; range, 1-59). Median duration on treatment was 4.1 months (range, 0.03-40.1). AEs occurred in 96.6% of patients. Grade 3-5 AEs occurred in 50.6% of patients. AEs led to pembrolizumab discontinuation in 12.7% of patients and death in 5.9%. Immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions occurred in 23.7% of patients (4.6% experienced multiple immune-mediated AEs/infusion reactions) and led to pembrolizumab discontinuation in 3.6% and death in 0.2%. Grade 3-5 immune-mediated AEs occurred in 6.3% of patients. Serious immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions occurred in 6.0% of patients. Median time to immune-mediated AE onset was 85 days (range, 13-163). Of 2657 immune-mediated AEs, 22.3% were initially treated with prednisone ≥ 40 mg/day or equivalent, and 8.3% were initially treated with lower steroid doses. CONCLUSIONS: This pooled analysis of 31 clinical trials showed that pembrolizumab has a consistent safety profile across indications.

Preconditioning with immunogenic cell death-inducing treatments for subsequent immunotherapy.

Since the dawn of anticancer immunotherapy, the clinical use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has increased exponentially. Monoclonal antibodies targeting CTLA-4 and the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction were first introduced for the treatment of patients with unresectable melanoma. In melanoma, ICI lead to durable regression in a significant number of patients and have thus been clinically approved as a first-line treatment of advanced disease. Over the past years an increasing number of regulatory approvals have been granted for the use of ICI in patients affected by a large range of distinct carcinomas. In retrospect surprisingly, it has been discovered that particularly successful chemotherapeutic treatments are able to trigger anticancer immune responses because they induce immunogenic cell death (ICD), hence killing cancer cells in a way that they elicit an immune response against tumor-associated antigens. Logically, preclinical studies as well as clinical trials are currently exploring the possibility to combine ICD inducers with ICI to obtain optimal therapeutic effects. Here, we provide a broad overview of current strategies for the implementation of combinatorial approaches involving ICD induction followed by ICI in anticancer therapy.

First-in-human study of naporafenib (LXH254) with or without spartalizumab in adult patients with advanced solid tumors harboring MAPK signaling pathway alterations.

BACKGROUND: We investigated naporafenib (LXH254), a pan-RAF kinase inhibitor, with or without spartalizumab, in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring MAPK pathway alterations. METHODS: This first-in-human phase 1 study had two dose-escalation arms: single-agent naporafenib (starting at 100 mg once-daily [QD]) and naporafenib (starting at the recommended dose/regimen)/spartalizumab (400 mg every 4 weeks). The naporafenib/spartalizumab dose-expansion part enrolled patients with KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and NRAS-mutated melanoma. The primary objectives were to establish the maximum tolerated doses (MTD)/recommended doses for expansion (RDE) and evaluate tolerability and safety. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients were included in the naporafenib dose-escalation (n = 87), naporafenib/spartalizumab dose-escalation (n = 12) and naporafenib/spartalizumab dose-expansion (n = 43) arms. The MTD/RDE of naporafenib was 600 mg twice-daily (BID). In naporafenib escalation, five patients experienced 7 dose-limiting toxicities: decreased platelet count (1200 mg QD); neuralgia, maculopapular rash, pruritus (600 mg BID); increased blood bilirubin, hyponatremia, peripheral sensory neuropathy (800 mg BID). No DLTs occurred in the naporafenib/spartalizumab arm: the RDE was established at 400 mg BID. The most common treatment-related adverse events were rash and dermatitis acneiform (each 24.1%; naporafenib), nausea and pruritus (each 33.3%; naporafenib/spartalizumab; escalation) and rash (39.5%; naporafenib/spartalizumab; expansion). Naporafenib reduced DUSP6 expression in tumors. Two partial responses (PRs) occurred in naporafenib escalation, and 1 complete response and 3 PRs in the naporafenib/spartalizumab NRAS-mutated melanoma and KRAS-mutated NSCLC arms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Naporafenib, with or without spartalizumab, showed an acceptable safety profile, pharmacodynamic activity and limited antitumor activity. Additional naporafenib combination therapies are currently under investigation.

Effectiveness and tolerance of electrochemotherapy as palliative therapy for patients with head and neck cancer and malignant melanoma and its relation to early skin reaction.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance after the electrochemotherapy treatment for local therapy of cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases of head-and-neck tumors and malignant melanoma refractory to standard therapies, mainly in neck metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma. And, to evaluate the relation of this response according to the skin reaction (healing with ulcer or dry crust). METHODS: prospective pase II, observational clinical study of 56 patients with metastases of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (n=13), papillary thyroid carcinoma (n=4), adenoid cystic carcinoma of parotid gland (n=1) or malignant melanoma (n=37, 5 in head). Patients were treated by electrochemotherapy (application of electrical pulses into the tumor) after the administration of a single intravenous dose of bleomycin. Kaplan-Meier curves were performed. The statistical significance was evaluated using log-rank test; p-value of less than 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: Overall clinical response was observed in 47 patients (84%). Local side effects were mild in all the patients. Ten patients (76.9%) with neck metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma had some degree of response, but only in one was complete. Patients even with only partial response had a higher overall survival than patients without response (p= 0.02). Most of the patients with squamous cell carcinoma had diminution of pain and anxiety. Response rate and overall survival was higher in MM patients (86.5%) than in squamous cell cancer patients (76.9%) (p= 0.043). The healing process (dry crust/ulcer) was not associated with the overall survival (p= 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Electrochemotherapy is associated a higher overall survival and diminution of pain and anxiety. Therefore, it is an option as palliative treatment for patients with neck metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma refractory to other therapies or even as a concomitant treatment with newer immunotherapies. The type of healing of the surgical wound could not be associated with a higher rate of response or survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

METASTATIC NODULAR MELANOMA DEVELOPING ON NEVUS SPILUS DURING INTAKE OF BETA BLOCKERS (BISOPROLOL/NEBIVOLOL) AND ACE INHIBITORS (PERINDOPRIL). POTENTIAL LINKS TО THE DRUG RELATED NITROSOGENESIS/CARCINOGENESIS, DUNNING-KRUGER EFFECT AND GENETIC WEAPONS OF THE NEW GENERATION.

Drug-induced Nitrosogenesis/Carcinogenesis turns out to be a ubiquitous, pervasive, large-scale, poorly controllable concept for the academic community, which underlies the long-term, permanent modification of the human genome by contact with nitrosamines/NDSRIs, which ultimately leads to the generation of diverse cancers, but also melanoma in particular. The discovery of a (currently) unclassifiable number of nitroso derivatives/genome modifiers in the most commonly distributed drugs worldwide (in about 300 preparations according to the FDA/includes beta blockers/bisoprolol/nebivolol and ACE inhibitors/perindopril), their forced tolerability, attributed as a necessity or lack of alternative also to the present (but also to future periods), and their proven carcinogenicity (already 70 years ago), suggest a kind of creepy form of experiment to which public health is subjected worldwide. The creation of a universal nitroso-comfort of pharmaceutical companies and the regulation of a permanent intake of carcinogens in drugs for years to come, but also decades back, suggest possible cartel agreements between the regulation/distribution unit and that of production cycles. These "agreements" are becoming increasingly evident and in all likelihood position nitrosogenesis from a until recently unknown element, to a pathogenetic factor of paramount importance. Melanoma could be viewed precisely as the controlled end gene-modified product of drug-mediated nitrosogenesis/carcinogenesis, proven to be a locoregional (but not only) phenomenon hundreds if not thousands of times. The dilemma stays: Are the nitrosamines in drugs genetic weapons, ethnic bioweapons for silent war ? The nitrosogenesis concerning melanoma leads to the logical conclusion that cancer is in fact a largely controlled set event or, according to others, a forced necessity of evolutionary globalization processes to purge the population in certain regions. In favor of this statement indicative are namely: 1) lack of regulatory control/results of such conducted, 2) complete information veil for the end user regarding contamination with carcinogens/nitrosamines in certain batches or all batches of drugs, 3) misinformation and lack of transparency regarding the concept of nitrosogenesis also for the academic community, as well as 4) the impunity to pharmaceutical conglomerates after criminal negligence/controlled criminogenicity proven thousands of times by the FDA/EMA leading to regulatory controlled drug mediated genocide of the human population in certain areas on a daily basis. And most important of all: 5) the lack of refusal to eliminate these drugs, i.e. - the imposition of forced tolerance at any cost. It is extremely unfortunate that the mentioned and identified grotesque/situation, its tolerance on a global scale, lead to a misjudgement of the significance of real tumor inducers within the global health map//statistics as well as melanoma. The focus of prevention is being displaced, while the incidence of cancer in general and that of melanoma is skyrocketing. Nitrosamines could be defined as the newest, modern, until recently invisible and unknown, but -controllable form of genetic weapon to modify the human genome. Because of these very facts, the likelihood that clinicians and the academic community are in the frozen and permanent state of the Dunning-Kruger effect is very real. Certain globalization regulatory elements create problems and assignments that must be solved ˝competently˝ by incompetent, fully regulatable compartments. As their state of competence depends again and entirely on ˝their incompetence˝. Until now. After the formalization of the concept of Nitrosogenesis (as a form of genetic weapon) and melanoma for example, but not only, it remains to be seen whether universal incompetence will become a guarantee of competence and the survival. Or- will it remain again at the level of globalized, criminally conditioned, appointed and regulated from above "competent incompetence". The dilemmas to regulators and manufacturers remain open : Is it competent to take drugs that contain carcinogens/nitrosamines? Is it competent for this issue to continue for decades with impunity? Is it competent for regulators not to inform consumers about the presence of carcinogens/genome modifiers in medicines for decades? Is it competent for certain regions to be affected by nitrosamine contamination and not others? Is it competent not to reflect this in regional and global health bulletins on side effects? Is it competent to make thousands of times the profits from the modified genetic map business, regulated and legally initiated through the intake of carcinogens? Is it competent to have the concentration of carcinogens within polymedication exceeding many times the daily allowable doses of carcinogens and have no solution for this? Is it competent, when the intake of nitrosamines in medicines is associated with the generation of melanomas and heterogeneous cancers- to have no alternative to this or when one is available- to conceal it skillfully? Is it competent to determine carcinogenic activity based on mutagenic tests? Is it competent to be polyincompetent within a framework of mass (in)competence? We report systemically administered drugs for the treatment of high blood pressure from the group of beta blockers (bisoprolol/nebivolol) and ACE inhibitors (perindopril) that have been identified by regulators in the face of FDA as hypothetically contaminated with nitrosamines/NDSRIs with a carcinogenic potency between 4 and 5, respectively. Within this cumulative intake, (which according to the regulators was not at risk of developing cancerous forms), similar to other cases in the world literature, the patient developed a relatively short-term, metastatic nevus spilus-based nodular melanoma. The paper analyses not only the role of nitrosogenesis, but also that of two pregnancies and painful sunburns as potential cofactors for melanoma genesis. Academic attention is drawn to the potential impact of drug-mediated nitrosogenesis/carcinogenesis. Nitrosamines in the framework of polycontamination and polymedication could also be identified as one of the most effective, until recently unknown, modern generation genetic weapons for modifying the human genome and controlling cancer. Moreover, they could be controllably applied and skillfully targeted. At least until now. The officialization of carcinogens in more than 250 of the most common drugs and the clinico-pathological correlations concerning the development of cancer/melanoma in poorly controlled geographical regions represent a kind of in vivo prospective study to determine precisely the real carcinogenic role of nitrosamines to date.

Pembrolizumab-induced immune-related sclerosing cholangitis.

Immunotherapy is increasingly used to treat various types of cancer; however, it can often result in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Immune-related sclerosing cholangitis (irSC) is a rare type of hepatic irAE that has been described only in a few cases, and much remains unknown about its optimal treatment. In this report, we describe the case of a man in his 70s who was diagnosed with metastatic melanoma and treated with pembrolizumab. He experienced multiple irAEs, including irSC, which did not respond to initial prednisone treatment (2 mg/kg daily dosing). However, subsequent treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) resulted in complete resolution of symptoms and normalisation of laboratory and radiographic abnormalities related to irSC. Our case suggests that steroids, which are traditionally used to treat irAEs, may be ineffective for irSC and that UDCA may be a better alternative. Clinicians should be aware of this rare irAE.

[Multiple sclerosis and melanoma]. / Rasseyannyi skleroz i melanoma.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune progressive demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, mainly in young people. The clinical picture of MS has a variety of neurological symptoms, which manifests itself during periods of exacerbation or progression and stabilizes at the moments of remission. The widespread introduction of new drugs with immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory mechanisms of action has led to the development of special risk management plans for monitoring patients during therapy and preventing adverse events and new comorbid conditions. This article presents a review of the literature and a case report on the combination of MS and melanoma in patients. Melanoma can rarely develop in patients treated with DMD, so it is necessary to introduce such a specialist in dermatology and venereology into a multidisciplinary team.

NITROSOGENESIS, ANTIDEPRESSANTS AND THE SERTRALIN INDUCED NEVUS ASSOCIATED CUTANEOUS MELANOMA: THE NDMA/ NNK (NDSRIS) CONTAMINATION AS MOST POTENT MELANOMA INDUCTORS: ALEA IACTA EST.

The purposeful oblivion of the objective truth, the disregard of scientific reality, the denial of the contributions and successes of surrounding researchers, the substitution of priorities in clinical routine and the unwillingness to reason in the right direction often lead to disastrous consequences in the field of public health. Controlled projects almost never lead to a significant contribution or breakthrough in medicine that will be remembered by future generations. Another illustrative example in this regard is the link shared above to the saga of the worldwide cancer pandemic and its possible real cause: the contamination of drugs with nitrosamines/NDSRIs. The carcinogenic action of nitrosamines in rats under experimental conditions was demonstrated as early as the early 1960s (1954) by Barnes and Magee. The series of subsequent experiments in their numerous research studies was strongly indicative of a pathogenetic role of nitrosamines / dimethylnitrosamine / in the development of liver cancer and kidney cancer. Starting from the fact that contact with nitrosamines is of primary importance for the development of tumours in animals, there is practically no circumstance that would lead us to believe that the intake of the same mutagens in man would have a different carcinogenic effect from that already known to us (as was found under experimental conditions as early as 1954, but in animals). On the contrary, to this day the incidence of cancer is increasing every year and, according to global statistics, it is projected to increase by nearly 50% or 18 million new cases by 2040. The intake of (un)identified nitrosamines found in drugs as contaminants is increasing analogously to the shared breakneck cancer incidence. In addition to the number of identified carcinogens or NDSRIs, the number of affected drug classes is also progressively growing and in mid-2023 this number amounts to over 250 drugs according to the official data of the FDA bulletin of 08.04.2023. In practice, the population/patients have been in a continuous, still ongoing, multicentric prospective study since 1954. The parameters of the ˝experiment˝ are probably pre-set, crystallizing gradually over time and imposed forcefully in the form of hypnotic suggestions and directives by regulators. Encouragingly , the results of the prospective study are also available, are not one-sided and have been published in dozens of international journals as well as in part in the well-known Cancer Journal of the clinicians / Impact factor 254,7. The bad news is that in most of these observations and results, there is no correlation of what is shared between, say, 1) mandatory alternative-free intake of mutagen-contaminated drugs and 2) the breakneck development of heterogeneous cancers/including melanomas, and the scientific vision of the studies is currently rather one-sided. Cancer incidence is skyrocketing (according to Globocan/Cancer Journal for the Clinicians), and not a single worldwide study has commented on its potential link to actual contamination of the most commonly used drugs worldwide with nitrosamines/NDSRIs. For the past 5 years, the team of the Bulgarian Society of Dermatological Surgery has been committed to formalizing the final results of these prospective nationwide observational studies and providing full transparency on the relationship between the intake of actual/potential nitrosamine-contaminated drugs and the development of skin cancer. Over 95% of newly reported skin cancers during this period (2016-2023) were associated with prior intake of drugs listed in the 2023 FDA as potentially nitrosamine/NDSRIs contaminated or carcinogens. Melanoma is one of the most significant patterns of tumor arising after contact of the human body with nitrosamines. Whether the drugs affected by the contamination are from the group of sartans, beta blockers, hydrochlorothiazide, calcium antagonists, ACE inhibitors or antidepressants- the ultimate side effect remains the same and is known to the scientific community as or by the frightening and loud name : melanoma. We report the occurrence of another case of nevus associated cutaneous melanoma and multiple dysplastic nevi after taking the antidepressant Sertraline. A drug declared according to the official FDA bulletin of 08.04.2023 as potentially contaminated with class 2 nitrosamines/ NDSRIs: having similar to completely identical carcinogenic potency as that of NDMA and NNK. Or reciprocal to that in valsartan, irbesartan, olmesartan, repeatedly described already as possible melanoma inducers. According to the literature search, this is also the first case in the world of Sertraline-induced nevus associated cutaneous melanoma, and we share the view/ thesis that the real inducer of the tumor is in fact the impurities in the medication in the form of contaminants or nitrosamines: the so-called NDSRIs. The nitrosogenesis of skin cancer is a more than significant concept that has been cleverly concealed by the scientific community until recently. The reason for this concealment could be sought in the paramount importance or central role that the nitrosogenesis occupies at the base of the "pyramid" guaranteeing billions of dollars of monthly revenue to the regulators of globalism.

The relationship between the history of PDE5-inhibitors assumption and melanoma: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5-is) are used worldwide as first line therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED). Current literature reported data on the warning association between PDE5-is use and the development of cutaneous melanoma. However, these data are contrasting, thus we aim to summarise evidence regarding this association. CONTENT: A systematic review of all published articles related to the effects of PDE5-is in the development of cutaneous melanoma was performed. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were queried for all the published studies indexed up to the 26th of May 2023. A combination of keywords related to PDE5-is and melanoma were used. Only original studies based on human subjects in the English language were included in the analysis. SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK: Of 505 articles identified, only eight original articles were considered for further analysis. Overall, five of the selected articles including 657,984 subjects agrees on an increased risk of developing melanoma in PDE5-is users. On the other hand, three original articles based on data regarding 360,915 subjects, disagree with the previous statement declaring any association between PDE5-i use and melanoma. Current literature still reports contrasting data regarding the association between PDE5-is assumption and increased risk of melanoma, but a possible association is described, bringing attention to higher risk melanoma category of patients. More clinical studies are needed to clarify the impact of PDE5-is in the development and progression of melanoma.

Pembrolizumab-Induced Fatal Myasthenia, Myocarditis, and Myositis in a Patient with Metastatic Melanoma: Autopsy, Histological, and Immunohistochemical Findings-A Case Report and Literature Review.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a major advance in cancer treatment. The lowered immune tolerance induced by ICIs brought to light a series of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Pembrolizumab belongs to the ICI class and is a humanized IgG4 anti-PD-1 antibody that blocks the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1. The ICI-related irAEs involving various organ systems and myocarditis are uncommon (incidence of 0.04% to 1.14%), but they are associated with a high reported mortality. Unlike idiopathic inflammatory myositis, ICI-related myositis has been reported to frequently co-occur with myocarditis. The triad of myasthenia, myositis, and myocarditis must not be underestimated as they can rapidly deteriorate, leading to death. Herein we report a case of a patient with metastatic melanoma who fatally developed myasthenia gravis, myocarditis, and myositis, after a single cycle of pembrolizumab. Considering evidence from the literature review, autopsy, histological, and immunohistochemical investigations on heart and skeletal muscle are presented and discussed, also from a medical-legal perspective.

NITROSOGENESIS OF CUTANEOUS MELANOMA: SIMULTANEOUSLY DEVELOPMENT OF PRIMARY CUTANEOUS THICK MELANOMA OF THE BREAST, THIN MELANOMA/DYSPLASTIC MOLE OF THE BACK DURING PARALLEL INTAKE OF BISOPROLOL, AMLODIPINE AND VALSARTAN/ HCT: NITROSAMINE POLYCONTAMINATION IN THE MULTIMEDICATION AS THE MOST POWERFUL SKIN CANCER TRIGGER.

According to the latest and modern concepts- polymorbidity and polymedication are perceived as one of the most likely triggers for the development and progression of skin cancer (and melanomas in particular). The reason for this should be sought in polycontamination with nitrosamines (in the context of polymorbidity and polymedication of affected patients). This polycontamination is expanding in scale with each passing day and this in turn allows its detailed (albeit postponed) analysis. The concept of polycontamination could be related on the one hand to: 1) the patient's medication (number of drugs affected by nitrosamine contamination), but also to: 2) the number of mutagens or so-called contaminants (nitrosamines) contained in a single drug preparation. Unfortunately, the recently introduced acceptable daily intake dose (ADI) as a concept by the regulatory institutions, does not find its much desired application due to : 1) the lack of precise indication regarding the nitrosamine concentration on the leaflet of each potentially/actually contaminated medicine ; 2) the immediately resulting impossibility to calculate the daily acceptable dose (concentration of mutagens) in each patient (within the framework of polymedication), as well as 3) the ever increasing number/type of those identified in medicines as contaminants. Thus, in practice, the daily medication intake (of several drugs belonging to the groups of drugs declared as officially contaminated) could have adverse consequences for the health of patients precisely due to the fact that: the concentration of nitrosamines in each of the drugs taken could (not) exceed the аcceptable daily intake dose, but the total cumulative intake for the day would (most likely) be - many times higher. At present, however, this calculation turns out to be more of a ˝dream˝: A delusion or a myth about a personalized medical approach. On a pragmatic level, it could be concluded that: the establishment of certain stereotypes of clinical behaviour (such as the occurrence of melanomas, for example) after the intake of a heterogeneous class of drugs (which in all likelihood contain relatively similar carcinogens/nitrosamines in terms of composition and concentration), should suggest at least a common pathogenesis. The article focuses the attention of clinicians on the issues related to the coadministration of potentially nitrosamine-contaminated drugs for high blood pressure (such as Bisoprolol, Amlodipine and Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide), while also emphasizing the outcomes that could result from this long-term co-administration: simultaneous appearance of thick melanoma in the left breast area, thin melanoma on the back and dysplastic nevus thoracic on the left. The Nitrosogenesis of melanoma appears to be a ˝new perspective/beam of light˝ concerning its pathogenesis, and from a radically different angle of observation. The confirmatory nature of the clinical picture (multiple melanomas) in the patient we presented could be seen as confirmatory of a number of analogous cases of multiple melanomas occurring after intake of nitrosamine contaminated antihypertensive drugs. The feasibility of personalized single-stage melanoma surgery, which was applied to the patient presented, is emphasized. The choice of a surgical resection field of 1 cm for thin melanomas with a suspected (clinically/ dermoscopically) tumour thickness of less than 1 mm proved in practice to be an adequate approach, in accordance with the standards of the newly developed innovative guideline for one step surgical removal of cutaneous melanomas (OSMS).

Skin Cancer and Hydrochlorothiazide: Novel Population-Based Analyses Considering Personal Risk Factors Including Race/Ethnicity.

BACKGROUND: Hydrochlorothiazide, a common antihypertensive, has photosensitive properties, potentially increasing skin cancer risk. We evaluated melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer among hydrochlorothiazide users with 3 different cohorts as each allows assessment of different potential cofounders/effect modifiers, including race/ethnicity. METHODS: We built 3 cohorts using IBM MarketScan Research Databases: Commercial and Encounters (>3.5 million individuals, 2010-2018), a subcohort with health risk assessment respondents (415, 330), and Medicaid (509, 767, 2011-2017). Adults (aged 18+ years) entered the respective cohort with a first-filled prescription (cohort entry) for hydrochlorothiazide (the exposure of interest) or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (the active comparator), with ≥12 months of continuous enrollment with medical/pharmacy coverage at baseline. We excluded those who used hydrochlorothiazide/ACE inhibitor (including fixed-dose combination products) 12 months before cohort entry and those with prior skin cancer, HIV, or organ transplant. We compared the risk for hydrochlorothiazide versus ACE inhibitor using multivariate proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar, aside from more Black individuals among hydrochlorothiazide users (43.3% [95% CI, 43.0%-43.6%]) than ACE inhibitor users (28.1% [95% CI, 27.9%-28.3%]). The hazard ratio (95% CI) for nonmelanoma skin cancer related to hydrochlorothiazide (versus ACE inhibitor) was 0.96 (0.91-1.00) in the Commercial cohort, 1.01 (0.77-1.32) for the health risk assessment subcohort, and 1.33 (0.77-2.29) for Medicaid. For melanoma, the respective hazard ratios were 1.07 (0.95-1.20), 0.85 (0.43-1.67), and 0.93 (0.51-1.67), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation using 3 different approaches, including adjustment for race/ethnicity, did not establish a clear difference between hydrochlorothiazide and ACE inhibitor in terms of skin cancer risk.

Elevated eosinophils proportion as predictor of immune-related adverse events after ipilimumab and nivolumab treatment of advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Ipilimumab and nivolumab treatment against advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) causes severe and lethal immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Predicting irAEs might improve clinical outcomes, however no practical biomarkers exist. This study examined whether eosinophils could be effective biomarkers for ≥grade 2 irAEs in RCC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 75 patients with RCC treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab between August 2018 and March 2021 in a multicenter study. Eosinophils were examined before and 2 weeks after treatment, and immediately after irAEs development. The optimal cut-off value for ≥grade 2 irAEs was determined by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Univariate and multivariate analyses were undertaken to identify predictors of ≥grade 2 irAEs. RESULTS: Two weeks after treatment, eosinophils were significantly upregulated in patients who had experienced ≥grade 2 irAEs than in those who had not experienced irAEs (mean, 5.7% vs. 3.2%; p < 0.05). The optimal cut-off value for eosinophils against ≥grade 2 irAEs was 3.0% (area under the curve = 0.69). In multivariate analyses, an eosinophil level ≥ 3.0% was a risk factor for ≥grade 2 irAEs (odds ratio 4.18, 95% confidence interval 1.16-15.1). The eosinophil level 2 weeks after treatment was upregulated by the onset of any type of irAEs including endocrine, gastrointestinal, pulmonary and skin disorders. CONCLUSIONS: An increased eosinophil level 2 weeks after treatment might be an effective biomarker for ≥grade 2 irAEs in patients with RCC treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab.

Delayed immune-mediated hepatitis after three cycles of pembrolizumab for the treatment of sinonasal melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that induce the anti-tumor effects of T cells by targeting co-inhibitory immune checkpoints. The development of ICIs has revolutionized the clinical practice of oncology, leading to significant improvements in outcomes; therefore, ICIs are now standard care for various types of solid cancers. Immune-related adverse events, the unique toxicity profiles of ICIs, usually develop 4-12 weeks after initiation of ICI treatment; however, some cases can occur >3 months after cessation of ICI treatment. To date, there have been limited reports about delayed immune-mediated hepatitis (IMH) and histopathologic findings. Herein, we present a case of delayed IMH that occurred 3 months after the last dose of pembrolizumab, including histopathologic findings of the liver. This case suggests that ongoing surveillance for immune-related adverse events is required, even after cessation of ICI treatment.

Predictors for the development of neurological immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and impact on mortality.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little is known about risk factors for developing neurological immunological adverse events (neuro-irAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We report the incidence, predictors for development, impact on mortality of neuro-irAEs, and impact of ICIs on pre-existing neurological conditions in a large clinical cohort. METHODS: Patients who received ICIs between January 2011 and December 2018 were identified from a tertiary cancer center registry. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient, cancer, and treatment data. Odds ratios from univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were calculated to identify potential predictors for developing a neuro-irAE. Impact of neuro-irAEs on overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Overall frequency of neurological irAEs was 2.3%. Peripheral nervous system complications were most frequent (53.6%). Melanoma, younger age, prior chemotherapy, prior resection, CTLA-4 ICIs exposure, and combination PD-1 and CTLA-4 ICIs exposure had significantly higher odds for developing a neuro-irAE (p < 0.05) in univariate but not multivariate models. Those with a neuro-irAE were less likely to die at 3 years compared to those without a neuro-irAE (69% vs. 55%, p = 0.004) in univariate but not multivariate model. Flare of pre-existing neurological condition after exposure to ICIs was present (15.4%, 2 of 13 patients) but manageable. One patient was rechallenged with ICIs without recurrent flare. CONCLUSIONS: Neuro-irAEs are not associated with increase in overall mortality. Potential predictors for the development of neuro-irAEs are younger age, melanoma, prior chemotherapy and resection, CTLA-4, or combination ICIs exposure.

Hormone replacement therapy did not increase risk of melanoma in Chinese female with menopausal and postmenopausal disorders: A population-based retrospective cohort study in Taiwan.

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is widely used to relieve symptoms of menopause with proven efficacy. However, there has been significant controversy surrounding the use of HRT because of its potential link with an increased risk of cancer, particularly female reproductive organ cancers. That HRT increases the risk of melanoma is also disputed, and several cohort studies have produced variable results. To delineate the association between HRT and melanoma in Taiwan, we conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study on 14 291 patients who had received HRT and 57 164 population controls in Taiwan between 2000 and 2013. Multivariate odds ratios (ORs) were calculated utilizing conditional logistic regression. Overall, the use of HRT was not significantly correlated with a higher risk of developing melanoma in Taiwan (95% confidence interval 0.386-1.099; p = 0.341). The hazard ratio analysis of melanoma and different HRTs showed there was no significant association between melanoma and the use of oral or external estrogens alone, including conjugated estrogens, estradiol, and estriol. Estrogen plus progesterone combined therapy was associated with a lower risk of melanoma. Only one case of melanoma was observed among the 2880 patients in this subgroup.

NEIGHBOURING MELANOMAS AND DYSPLASTIC NEVUS DEVELOPING SIMULTANEOUSLY AFTER CANDESARTAN INTAKE: NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION/ AVAILABILITY AS MAIN CAUSE FOR SKIN CANCER DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION.

Although the problem with nitrosamines and their connection to the generation of skin cancer deepens, it is also thoroughly, carefully, and obligingly neglected. The probable reason for this is in all likelihood the lack of a solution or way out of this situation at the regulatory level. There is almost no sartan (on the European market/certain countries) after taking which the development of single or multiple melanomas, as well as melanomas in combination with single/multiple keratinocyte tumors, is not observed. But also, skin tumors (again melanomas) in combination with up to two other tumors - simultaneously or subsequently. These cases are immediately reported to the regional regulatory units, but unfortunately to no avail. Valsartan, irbesartan, olmesartan, and now candesartan is the main "suspect medications" for the development of melanomas, regardless of the dilemma: 1) whether the available nitrosamine remains responsible (for melanoma) as a mono/poly-contaminant (as availability or at a certain dose) or 2) is the generic substance itself also partly to blame? The literature data on the subject are contradictory, but does not exclude the involvement of any of these units in the generation and progression of melanomas. The lack of official results of possible checks for the presence (of nitrosamines) after the side effect reports were submitted to regulatory bodies further deepened the doubts of the clinicians, supporting the possible pathogenetic role of not only nitrosamines as a key link regarding the development of skin cancer. In practice, permissive regimes for the availability of carcinogens/mutagens in minimum permissible amounts, have been established? It is unclear whether this should be interpreted as a powerlessness of the regulatory authorities in the face of powerful pharmaceutical concerns? Or is it rather a lull before the start of general regulatory changes and a forthcoming "shifting of the layers"? The paradox also arises from the fact that many contaminated batches are quickly, quietly withdrawn from the market, despite being declared harmless or dangerous only for animals. We report on a patient who developed thin melanoma and neighbouring melanoma in situ after receiving candesartan, treated via one step melanoma surgery within one surgical session with a complete surgical margin of 2 cm. In parallel with the mentioned, a dysplastic nevus was observed clinically and confirmed dermatoscopically in the area of left scapula, for which surgical treatment is planned. Based on the currently available literature data, a thorough analysis of the role of nitrosamines, as a possible powerful pathogenetic factor for the occurrence and progression of melanomas, was made. The possible role of the generic substance as a cofactor in the carcinogenesis of skin cancer is also discussed.

Association of soft drinks and 100% fruit juice consumption with risk of cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: Studies of the associations between soft drinks and the risk of cancer showed inconsistent results. No previous published systematic reviews and meta-analysis has investigated a dose-response association between exposure dose and cancer risk or assessed the certainty of currently available evidence. Therefore, we aim to demonstrate the associations and assessed the certainty of the evidence to show our confidence in the associations. METHODS: We searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to Jun 2022, to include relevant prospective cohort studies. We used a restricted cubic spline model to conduct a dose-response meta-analysis and calculated the absolute effect estimates to present the results. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: Forty-two articles including on 37 cohorts enrolled 4,518,547 participants were included. With low certainty evidence, increased consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) per 250 mL/day was significantly associated with a 17% greater risk of breast cancer, a 10% greater risk of colorectal cancer, a 30% greater risk of biliary tract cancer, and a 10% greater risk of prostate cancer; increased consumption of artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs)re per 250 mL/day was significantly associated with a 16% greater risk of leukemia; increased consumption of 100% fruit juice per 250 mL/day was significantly associated with a 31% greater risk of overall cancer, 22% greater risk of melanoma, 2% greater risk of squamous cell carcinoma, and 29% greater risk of thyroid cancer. The associations with other specific cancer were no significant. We found linear dose-response associations between consumption of SSBs and the risk of breast and kidney cancer, and between consumption of ASBs and 100% fruit juices and the risk of pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS: An increment in consumption of SSBs of 250 mL/day was positively associated with increased risk of breast, colorectal, and biliary tract cancer. Fruit juices consumption was also positively associated with the risk of overall cancer, thyroid cancer, and melanoma. The magnitude of absolute effects, however, was small and mainly based on low or very low certainty of evidence. The association of ASBs consumption with specific cancer risk was uncertain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42020152223.